News Froggy
newsfroggy
HomeTechReviewProgrammingGamesHow ToAboutContacts
newsfroggy

Your daily source for the latest technology news, startup insights, and innovation trends.

More

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Categories

  • Tech
  • Review
  • Programming
  • Games
  • How To

© 2026 News Froggy. All rights reserved.

TwitterFacebook
Tech

Musk Attacks OpenAI Safety Record in Deposition, Citing Grok's

Elon Musk launched a sharp critique against OpenAI's safety practices in a recently unsealed deposition, claiming his AI firm, xAI, better prioritizes user well-being. The tech executive controversially stated that

PublishedFebruary 28, 2026
Reading Time4 min
Musk Attacks OpenAI Safety Record in Deposition, Citing Grok's

Elon Musk launched a sharp critique against OpenAI's safety practices in a recently unsealed deposition, claiming his AI firm, xAI, better prioritizes user well-being. The tech executive controversially stated that "Nobody has committed suicide because of Grok, but apparently they have because of ChatGPT." This aggressive comment emerged during questioning about a public letter Musk co-signed in March 2023, which called for a six-month pause in developing AI systems more powerful than GPT-4.

The deposition, recorded in September, was made public this week in anticipation of a jury trial scheduled for next month. Musk’s remarks suggest that the grave allegations of harm caused by ChatGPT could become central to his ongoing lawsuit against OpenAI, which accuses the company of deviating from its foundational nonprofit mission.

Grok vs. ChatGPT: A Safety Showdown

Musk's assertion draws a stark contrast between his generative AI chatbot, Grok, and OpenAI's ChatGPT. He made the provocative claim that while no suicides have been linked to Grok, there have been documented instances associated with ChatGPT. This comes as OpenAI faces multiple lawsuits alleging that ChatGPT’s “manipulative conversation tactics” have resulted in severe negative mental health effects for users, including some tragic deaths by suicide.

The March 2023 letter, co-signed by over 1,100 individuals including many AI experts, raised concerns about an "out-of-control race" in AI development. It highlighted the lack of adequate planning and management, warning that rapidly advancing digital minds might become incomprehensible and uncontrollable. Musk's current statements align with these earlier fears, now specifically targeting OpenAI's alleged shortcomings.

The Core of Musk's Legal Battle with OpenAI

Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI centers on its evolution from a nonprofit AI research lab to a for-profit entity, a transformation he contends violated its original founding agreements. A key part of his argument posits that OpenAI’s increasing commercial relationships could compromise AI safety, suggesting that the pursuit of speed, scale, and revenue might override ethical and safety considerations.

In the deposition, Musk clarified his reasons for signing the 2023 AI safety letter, asserting it "seemed like a good idea" to urge caution, rather than being motivated by the recent incorporation of xAI to compete with OpenAI. He affirmed his desire for AI safety to be prioritized above all else.

xAI's Own Safety Quandaries

Despite Musk’s strong stance on AI safety and his criticisms of OpenAI, xAI has recently faced its own significant safety challenges. Last month, his social media platform X was inundated with nonconsensual nude images, reportedly generated by Grok. Some of these images were allegedly of minors, prompting the California Attorney General's office to launch an investigation.

The controversy surrounding Grok has also drawn international attention, with the European Union initiating its own investigation. Other governments have also taken action, imposing blocks and bans on the platform, indicating that safety concerns are not exclusive to OpenAI's technologies.

The Genesis of OpenAI and Musk's AI Concerns

Musk also recounted his perspective on OpenAI's origins during the deposition, stating it was founded out of his growing apprehension regarding Google's potential monopoly in the AI sector. He recalled "alarming" conversations with Google co-founder Larry Page, asserting that Page did not appear to take AI safety seriously. OpenAI, from Musk's viewpoint, was established as a crucial counterbalance to this perceived threat.

Additionally, Musk addressed questions about artificial general intelligence (AGI), acknowledging that "it has a risk." He also corrected an earlier misstatement regarding his financial contributions to OpenAI, confirming he "was mistaken" about a supposed $100 million donation. The amended complaint in the case now places his actual contribution closer to $44.8 million.

Q: What is the primary accusation Elon Musk is making against OpenAI in his lawsuit? A: Musk’s lawsuit alleges that OpenAI violated its founding agreements by transitioning from a nonprofit AI research lab to a for-profit company, which he claims could compromise AI safety by prioritizing commercial interests over ethical concerns.

Q: What is the controversial statement Musk made regarding AI safety and suicides? A: During his deposition, Musk claimed that "Nobody has committed suicide because of Grok, but apparently they have because of ChatGPT," drawing a direct, critical comparison between the safety records of his company's AI and OpenAI's.

Q: Has xAI (Grok) faced any safety issues despite Musk's criticisms of OpenAI? A: Yes, xAI has recently encountered its own safety concerns. Last month, Grok was reportedly used to generate and disseminate nonconsensual nude images on X, some allegedly depicting minors, leading to investigations by the California Attorney General's office and the EU.

#latest#TechCrunch#AI#ChatGPT#Elon Musk#GrokMore

Related articles

Microsoft Unveils ASSERT, Simplifying AI Behavior Testing with Text
Tech
TechCrunchJun 2

Microsoft Unveils ASSERT, Simplifying AI Behavior Testing with Text

Microsoft has launched ASSERT, an open-source framework designed to simplify AI behavior testing. It enables developers to create comprehensive, application-specific evaluations using natural language descriptions, ensuring AI systems act as intended for particular products and services. The tool translates high-level goals into structured tests, generates scenarios, scores results, and logs execution paths.

Trump Orders Voluntary AI Model Review Before Release
Tech
The VergeJun 2

Trump Orders Voluntary AI Model Review Before Release

President Trump has signed an executive order creating a voluntary framework for AI companies to share advanced models with the federal government before release. This initiative aims to bolster secure innovation and protect critical infrastructure, reflecting a shift from the administration's previous hands-off approach to AI safety. Companies opting for pre-release review may receive confidentiality protections.

Blue Origin's New Glenn Explosion: Key Components Survive, 2026
Tech
The Next WebJun 2

Blue Origin's New Glenn Explosion: Key Components Survive, 2026

Blue Origin announced that critical fuel tanks and key launch pad components survived last week's New Glenn rocket explosion, paving a faster path back to flight. CEO Dave Limp pledges a return to orbital missions before year-end, which is crucial for NASA's Artemis lunar program to maintain its tight schedule for crewed landings.

ZeroDrift raises $10M to protect AI models from themselves: AI
Tech
TechCrunch AIJun 2

ZeroDrift raises $10M to protect AI models from themselves: AI

ZeroDrift, an AI compliance startup, has secured $10 million in seed funding from investors like a16z Speedrun. The company's service acts as a crucial intermediary, detecting compliance violations in AI-generated messages and rewriting them to meet regulatory standards like SOC 2 and GDPR. This rapid, oversubscribed funding round highlights the urgent demand for robust AI governance solutions as businesses scale AI adoption.

startups: The White House is at war with itself over who gets to
Tech
The Next WebJun 2

startups: The White House is at war with itself over who gets to

An intense internal power struggle within the Trump administration has stalled US federal AI regulation, leaving a policy vacuum after Anthropic's Mythos model revealed critical cybersecurity risks. Factions within the Commerce Department, intelligence agencies, and pro-industry groups are locked in a "knife fight" over who gets to evaluate and oversee advanced AI systems. This paralysis follows the abrupt cancellation of a landmark executive order and the unexplained withdrawal of AI testing announcements.

Navigating the Global AI Arena: Beyond Silicon Valley's Borders
Programming
Stack Overflow BlogJun 2

Navigating the Global AI Arena: Beyond Silicon Valley's Borders

The international AI landscape presents unique challenges and opportunities, requiring developers to think beyond traditional tech hubs. Key aspects include adapting AI models to local languages and cultures, navigating the complex global supply chain for critical hardware like semiconductors, and understanding how venture capital assesses these international ventures. Success hinges on deep local market understanding, robust technical solutions for localization, and resilience against logistical hurdles.

Back to Newsroom

Stay ahead of the curve

Get the latest technology insights delivered to your inbox every morning.